Chiropractic + Naturopathic Doctor

Connecticut State Board Hearings On Informed Consent

Maria DiDanieli   

Features Profession Regulations

Jan.
28, Hamden, CT – On Friday, January 22, 2010, the Connecticut Board of
Chiropractic Examiners concluded its fourth day of intense and often
contentious testimony on a proposed rule that if enacted, would require
specific written warnings by doctors of chiropractic in that state of the
possible risk of stroke following a chiropractic adjustment, to be acknowledged
by the patient’s signature.



The
International Chiropractors Association (ICA), working in close cooperation
with the Connecticut Chiropractic Council (CCC), the Connecticut Chiropractic
Association (CCA) and the American Chiropractic Association (ACA), has sought
to bring the debate on this issue back to the science and research data, which
strongly indicates that any such warning is simply not called for or
appropriate based on the clinical safety record.

Advertisement

Respected researcher and epidemiologist J. David Cassidy, DC, PhD, Dr.Med.Sc,
testified as a key witness at the hearings. The objective of his testimony was
to bring to the Board’s attention the compelling body of scientific data that
is most relevant to the issue; the sum of which is that the research record
does not support a mandated warning. 

“The most
recent research (Neck Pain Task Force Report of the Bone and Joint Decade
2000-2010, a United Nations & WHO sanctioned study) indicates neck
manipulation is safe and effective form of health care” according to Matt
Pagano, DC chiropractic profession spokesperson.

Speaking as an expert witness and consultant to the International Chiropractors
Association (ICA), but with the support of all of the chiropractic
organizations (American Chiropractic Association, Association of Chiropractic
Colleges, Foundation for Chiropractic Progress, Life West, New York College of
Chiropractic, Parker College of Chiropractic, Palmer College of Chiropractic,
University of Bridgeport College of Chiropractic) involved in the hearing
process, Dr. Cassidy addressed key facts and issues on the basis of the
existing science and research record, to which he has been a significant
contributor on the issue before the Board. The objective of his testimony was
to bring the discussion on an emotional issue back to the science and the
objective research record.

Dr. Cassidy joined an extensive list of witnesses representing the chiropractic
profession, including William J. Lauretti, DC, James J. Lehman, DC, MBA, J.
Clay McDonald, DC, JD, MBA, Gerard W. Clum, DC, Stephen M. Perle, DC, MS, and Gina
Carucci, DC, MS, DICCP, who appeared on behalf of the Connecticut Chiropractic
Association (CCA) and George Curry, DC, FICA, who appeared on behalf of the
Connecticut Chiropractic Council (CCC).

“The chiropractic profession unequivocally supports a patient’s right to be
informed of the material benefits and risks of any type of healthcare treatment
– not just chiropractic. Legislation or regulatory mandates governing informed
consent should apply to all healthcare providers and all treatments in equal
measure. A new law, regulation or mandate, however, highlighting one specific
treatment by a specific health care profession that carries with it an
extremely rare association, with no causal link identified in the research, is
simply not good public health policy. It would set an unnecessary precedent for
all health care providers, procedures and products that would be virtually
impossible to implement”, said Pagano.

The existing informed consent standards in Connecticut allow for the best opportunity
for shared decision making between a patient and their health care provider.
Further, the chiropractic organizations participating in the hearing process
all believe informed consent is more than a piece of paper; it is a process. It
should occur in the context of a discussion between a doctor and a patient, and
it should be appropriately documented.

In a finding highly relevant to the issue before the Connecticut Board of
Chiropractic Examiners, the study demonstrated that patients suffering from headache
and neck pain are no more likely to suffer from a stroke following a visit to a
chiropractor than they are after a visit to a family medical physician.
Therefore this implies that there are factors other than the type of care
provided by doctors of chiropractic. It’s important to note that millions of
patients safely benefit from chiropractic care every year—they are able to
return to their normal activities and enjoy a better quality of life.

Dr. Cassidy was an investigator with The Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task
Force on Neck Pain & It’s Associated Disorders of the World Health
Organization (WHO). The work of this international task force whose study
affirms the safety and benefits of chiropractic care for people with neck pain
– a condition which is frequently treated by doctors of chiropractic was
released February 2008. The Bone and Joint Decade Task Force on Neck Pain and
its Associated Disorders initiated this new population-based, case-control and
case-crossover study, which appeared in the Feb. 15, 2008, edition of the
journal Spine.

The study—which analyzed nine-years’ worth of data from a population of 110
million person-years—concluded that vertebrobasilar artery (VBA) stroke is a
very rare event and that the risk of VBA stroke associated with a visit to a
chiropractor’s office appears to be no different than the risk of VBA stroke
following a visit to the office of a primary care medical physician.

The study goes on to say that any observed association between a VBA stroke and
chiropractic manipulation, as well as its apparent association with PCP visits,
is likely due to patients with an undiagnosed vertebral artery dissection
seeking care for neck pain and headache prior to their stroke.

The organizations representing the chiropractic profession believe this most
recent evidence should help to dispel any myths on this issue, as well as
provide more data to support the safety and effectiveness of chiropractic
procedures.

As a profession, doctors of chiropractic remain committed to expanding the
research and clinical understanding of the VBA, because even one cerebral
vascular incident that could have been detected early is one too
many.

Source, International Chiropractic Association,
please visit www.chiropractic.org


Print this page

Advertisement

Stories continue below