Research Review Corner: Predictors of Favourable Outcome for Neck Pain
Shawn ThistleFeatures Research
Study Title: Predictors of favourable outcome in patients treated by chiropractors for neck pain
Authors: Rubenstein S et al.
Publication Information: Spine 2008; 33(13): 1451-1458.
Neck pain is common, and is often the reason patients seek care from chiropractors. In order to select the best treatment for patients and facilitate appropriate referral, it would be helpful for chiropractors to be able to identify, before commencing care, which patients are likely to benefit from chiropractic care (in most cases, spinal manipulation).
Previous literature on neck pain suggests that higher neck pain intensity and previous episodes of neck pain are poor prognostic indicators.(1) Other seemingly important factors include self-perceived poor well-being, lower expectations of treatment, concomitant low back pain, age older 40 years, and current neck pain episode longer than three months.(2,3)
In order to build on this existing literature, this prospective, practice-based cohort study was designed to examine socio-demographic and clinical factors related to outcome in patients with neck pain undergoing chiropractic care. Chiropractors in private clinics throughout the Netherlands recruited patients with neck pain on the first visit, and followed up with them on the second and fourth visits, as well as at three and 12 months post-baseline. Patients were between 18-65 years of age, had not received any manual therapy in the previous three months, and had no contraindications to cervical manipulation. Those with specific pathology (tumour, infection etc.) were excluded. Data was collected through self-administered questionnaires at all time points. Twenty-nine patient-related, prognostic variables were examined. Clinical outcome measures included:
- neck pain in the previous 24 hours measured with an 11-point numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) neck disability measured with the Neck Disability Index (NDI)
- A prognostic model was developed using a multivariate, multilevel (time, patient, and chiropractor), longitudinal (linear and logistic) regression analysis.
Pertinent Results of this Study Include:
– 79 chiropractors (42 per cent of the available population) participated during the seven month recruitment period.
Conclusions and Practical Application:
It is interesting to note that despite the large number of determinants identified in this study, only one – number of days with neck pain – was retained in all models. This is consistent with other literature which shows that short duration of pain is predictive of positive outcome for other musculoskeletal complaints. Clinicians should consider this in conjunction with the other factors identified here that predicted favourable outcomes when discussing prognosis with neck pain patients:
- intermittent neck pain
- not being on sick leave or compensation
- higher education level
- less tiredness
- higher confidence in treatment
- lack of morning pain
The principal limitations of this study include the potential for misclassifying recovery, participation and response bias, lack of hypothesis testing (rather a “naïve” analysis was performed), and the lack of a control group. •
- Borghouts JA, Koes BW, Bouter LM. The clinical course and prognostic factors of non-specific neck pain: A systematic review. Pain 1998; 77: 1-13.
- Kjellman G, Skargren E, Oberg B. Prognostic factors for perceived pain and function at one-year follow-up in primary care patients with neck pain. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 364-370.
- Hoving JL et al. Prognostic factors for neck pain in general practice. Pain 2004; 110: 639-645.
Dr. Shawn Thistle is the founder and president of Research Review Service, Inc., an online, subscription-based service designed to help busy practitioners to integrate current, relevant scientific evidence into their practice. Shawn graduated from CMCC and holds an Honours Degree in Kinesiology from McMaster University. He also holds a certificate in Contemporary Medical Accupuncture from McMaster University, and is a Certified Active Release Techniques (ART) Provider. For more information about the Research Review Service, visit http://www.researchreviewservice.com
Print this page